Colour Trading App Lists, and Why They All Differ

Search for a list of these apps and you will find dozens, no two of them agreeing. That is not because the market is hard to survey — it is because almost every list is a placement page rather than a survey.

Affiliate placementsNo two agreeStale within monthsRead the incentive

How lists are made

Four Kinds, and What Each Is For

Sorted by how much the order tells you about the apps rather than about the page.

Affiliate ranking pages

Ordered by commission per deposit. The wording is review-shaped and the sequence is a rate card.

Advertising

Aggregator download pages

Lists of packages with no evaluation attached, frequently including repackaged builds alongside official ones.

Caution

Group and channel lists

Shared inside prediction communities, usually with referral codes attached and no checks performed at all.

Caution

Regulator registers

Not a list of apps but a list of licensed operators, which is the only authoritative source in this whole category.

Useful

What the lists share

Five Recurring Features

Once you notice these, the pages become quick to read and quicker to dismiss.

The same twenty names

Rotated in different orders. The pool of brands is smaller than the number of pages describing it.

A bonus figure in every row

Almost always the headline number without the wagering multiplier, which is the part that decides the value.

Ratings with no method

Four-point-eight out of five, awarded by nobody, measured against nothing, on every entry.

No permission information

The one comparison that would genuinely distinguish two apps, absent from every list we have read.

A download button per row

Which is the actual purpose of the page, and the reason the rest of it exists.

A list that ranks twenty apps and never once mentions a permission list is not comparing the apps. It is arranging them.

The tell

Reading one usefully

Three Things a List Can Legitimately Give You

There is some value in these pages, as long as it is the right value.

The names in circulation. Useful for recognising a brand you have been sent. Treat the list as an index rather than a ranking.
The operator behind each name. Occasionally stated. Where it is, that is the fact worth extracting — the operator is what you would actually be choosing.
A sense of how fast brands rotate. Compare two lists a year apart. The turnover in names is the most informative thing these pages contain.

Instead of a list

What to Do With a Name You Have Been Given

Four checks, applicable to any brand including one that appears next month.

Look up the licence

Find the number on the app or site, then verify it on the regulator's own register rather than the operator's page.

Check the payee

On the deposit screen. A registered business account rather than an individual is the sharpest single distinction in this market.

Read the permission list

Before installing, in full. This is the comparison the ranking pages omit and the one that matters most.

Test a small withdrawal

Early, before playing seriously. It answers what no list can tell you about how an operator actually behaves.

Why we do not publish our own list

Any ranking we produced would be stale within a year as brands rotate, and it would invite readers to trust an order rather than run the checks. A checklist works on an app that does not exist yet; a list stops working the moment the names change.

Why There Are So Many of These Pages

Because the search term signals intent to deposit, and that intent is worth a commission to whoever captures it. Producing a ranking costs an afternoon, requires no testing, and earns whenever a reader signs up. The result is a search results page where nearly every entry has the same business model and none of them has examined anything.

This is not a conspiracy so much as an equilibrium. Nobody is paid to publish a page saying the apps are broadly identical and the operator is what matters, so very few such pages exist.

The Honest Version of a List

A regulator's register of licensed operators, filtered to those offering this category of game. It is dull, it does not rank anything, and it is the only list in this space whose ordering means nothing and whose contents can be verified.

How the names on these lists keep changing is covered on the names and logos page, and every guide is on the home page.

Sideloaded app install screen with no store listing and requests for storage, contacts and SMS permissions

FAQ

Five questions about app lists and rankings.

Because the order usually reflects what each operator pays per referred deposit rather than any measurement. Two lists differ because two affiliates have different deals.

No, but there are registers of licensed operators kept by regulators. That is the only authoritative list in this category.

They are unmethodical. A 4.8 out of 5 with no stated criteria, no sample and no losing entries is a design element rather than a measurement.

Use it to learn which names exist, then run your own checks on the operator — licence, payee, permissions and a small withdrawal.

The pool of brands is smaller than the number of pages describing it, so the same twenty rotate through different orders.